Thursday, 1 September 2011

pne: A picture of a plush toy, halfway between a duck and a platypus, with a green body and a yellow bill and feet. (Default)

John Wells reports “some assorted nuggets of interest” from the ICPHs XVII (the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences) in Hong Kong.

One of them is particularly interesting for me as a native speaker of German, and perhaps for those of you who speak German, too:

Klaus Kohler [sic] [demonstrated] among other things that German listeners needed no more than the palatalization of a single segment n to hear kann Ihnen rather than just kann, deeply buried in the middle of a rapidly spoken colloquial sentence.

And I tried it myself and I think I can nearly reproduce that, at least for the speaking bit (harder to test the comprehension bit): kann is [kʰan] while kann Ihnen is [kʰanʲː]. (Not quite [kʰaɲː], I don’t think.) I can imagine that in rapid speech, the final length would get lost, leaving only the palatalisation.

...and here I thought German had no palatalisation! (True, it's phonetic only, not phonemic, but still: very interesting. To me, at least :D)

It also provides a lovely synchronic example of how segments can get lost while their ghost remains in the effect they have on the surrounding segments: similar thing occur in all sorts of areas such as umlaut, tone, or Greenlandic uvularisation. And also how this can cause phoneme splits if segments get lost, where the previously allophonic distinction (caused by the presence of the affecting segment) becomes phonemic when the segment drops entirely (as with Greenlandic vowels, where three phonemic vowels [six, if you count vowel length] split into six [twelve], once the uvular consonant got assimilated completely to a following consonant, forming a non-uvular geminate, while the vowel remained uvularised).

pne: Three columns, fading from red - green - blue, respectively, at the top down to black at the bottom. (rgb)

…I just realised that my (old) “colourcube-111” icon and my (fairly new) “Maxwell colour triangle” icon are essentially the same thing, just arranged slightly differently:

colourcube-111: a hexagon with a colour gradient Maxwell colour triangle: a triangle with pure red, green, blue at the vertices, shading towards pure white in the middle

Edit: I’m intrigued by the fact that when I hover over the icons on Dreamwidth, I get a little hover window saying “This is you” and some links… even though it’s “just an image” and not specifically functioning as a userpic (next to my name in an entry, etc.). I suppose the code can’t know that :)

pne: A very tight black-and-white pattern (one pixel black, one white, and so on) (moiré)

See whether your screen can resolve all the dots in the userpic properly or whether you get “beats”, smushed areas, colour banding, or other artefacts :)

Incidentally, I’m a bit surprised that the GIF version of this image was nearly three times the size of the PNG version; my experience had been that for very small images, GIF can win. I guess that’s true only for sub-100-byte files where the size of the header starts to matter, compared to the compression ability.

Edit: saving the icon as a greyscale PNG instead of a palette one shaved another 1/6 off the filesize—now it’s under 100 bytes! (I’m a tad disappointed that the PNGOUT plugin didn’t do that for me in its “Auto” colour type setting.)

Profile

pne: A picture of a plush toy, halfway between a duck and a platypus, with a green body and a yellow bill and feet. (Default)
Philip Newton

June 2015

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
2122232425 2627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Saturday, 3 January 2026 09:42
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios