Have you read _This Book_?
Saturday, 4 December 2004 08:32![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It annoys me slightly when people write in HTML and underline book titles such as, say, Animal Farm.
As far as I know, "proper" typography used italics for book titles, and underlining is merely a necessity forced on users of typewriters who had no separate italics typeface. Well, guess what: in HTML you do have an "italics" tag! So I consider it proper to italicise titles (Animal Farm).
In the spirit of semantic markup, I suppose a separate tag would be better, but I can't think of one whose meaning matches, so I just use the generic <i>
tag. (Which I also use for, say, marking up foreign words that are still perceived to be foreign, when I do so, as in vice versa.)
no subject
Date: Friday, 3 December 2004 23:42 (UTC)You consider "vice versa" to be foreign? Or do you mean, just when you write in German it's considered foreign?
What I'll never understand is why some people feel the need to differentiate between the <em> tag and the <i> tag, or between the <strong> tag and the <bold> tag. I once had a friend edit some HTML for my web page (this was back before CSS; heck, it was back when the use of frames was highly controversial) and he insisted it was no longer preferred to use the <i> tag and changed all my <i>'s to <em>'s.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, 4 December 2004 02:54 (UTC)But I hate seeing stuff underlined in HTML regardless because I always think it's a link.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Saturday, 4 December 2004 10:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 4 December 2004 11:53 (UTC)So nyah.
The correct tag is cite
Date: Saturday, 4 December 2004 17:37 (UTC)A user stylesheet can then determine how it is displayed.
Re: The correct tag is cite
From:Re: The correct tag is cite
From: