Random factoid
Sunday, 1 January 2006 21:12The things you learn when reading Wikipedia...
Apparently, for a while, giving someone malaria was used to treat syphilis—doctors had observed that in some patients, a high fever enabled the patient to recover from syphilis, and malaria leads to long and high fevers.
The risk was considered acceptable because malaria was treatable with quinine, which was available, while there were no effective direct cures for syphilis at the time (especially for later stages of the disease).
So I guess that if you had syphilis, they'd give you malaria, then after you'd been in fever for "long enough", they'd give you quinine to get you off malaria. Whee. Sounds like tons of fun.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 1 January 2006 21:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 1 January 2006 22:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 1 January 2006 22:32 (UTC)Descriptively, it is starting to pick up the secondary, contradictory meaning of "a fact that is minor in importance". Prescriptively, though, it's a word that is misused perhaps more blatantly and more often in popular culture than any other. Prescriptively, you might be better using the words "trivia", "odd fact", or just "fact".
I have never claimed to be a master prescriptivist, but this one irks me somewhat, I think particularly due to the contrasting "factual" vs "counterfactual" meanings.
That aside, the trivia itself is highly interesting, and more than a little entertaining.
no subject
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006 05:15 (UTC)http://medinfo.ufl.edu/other/histmed/clancy/ is about "the History of Syphilis" which has a slide (http://medinfo.ufl.edu/other/histmed/clancy/slide66.html) which briefly mentions the malarial therapy. Supposedly, http://medinfo.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/ra.cgi?histmed/clancy.ra&47-12 is a link to an audio commentary on that slide, though I didn't listen to it to check.
http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laureates/1927/wagner-jauregg-lecture.html is a better source, though -- apparently a 1927 Nobel Lecture in which the treatment is mentioned.
no subject
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006 05:17 (UTC)Though it's true that I use the word in your sense (2) above as well (more specifically, perhaps, as "a fact that seems relatively useless" -- "(piece of) trivia" might possibly be better for that).
no subject
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006 05:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006 11:45 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006 13:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 05:49 (UTC)I've patched things up a little and while they're not perfect, mail to pne@livejournal.com should at least go through again for now. You can also use philip.newton@gmail.com and/or Philip.Newton@gmx.net, which are two of the addresses that the LJ email eventually used to get sent to.
Secret bunny mail is still down, unfortunately, so if you wanted to send something that relies on that, you're stuck.