Went to lookup a FAQ on LiveJournal this morning... they switched the site scheme on me! Suddenly, it was in Xcolibur instead of the Dystopia I had become used to.
I was not particularly pleased. Went to /manage/siteopts.bml and switched back, but that set a cookie with my scheme preference—so it'll probably still be "messed up" in my other browsers which don't have this cookie set and I'll have to select it all over again.
Edit: Ah, I see there's an announcement in
news about this. It seems to have garnered quite a few comments, too (1048 right now).
Edit: Hm, it does seem to remember my scheme choice with my user. At any rate, in two other browsers on this machine, it gave my Dystopia as soon as I logged in (though it was Xcolibur before that). I'm slightly mollified now.
Re: Order of the Phoenix
Date: Saturday, 20 September 2003 20:10 (UTC)Harry Potter fandom
Date: Monday, 22 September 2003 07:15 (UTC)It's certainly been suggested by fans
My gut reaction to this is "well, maybe some fans have too much time on their hands". Incidentally, the first thing that came to mind after that was the entry on "fanon" from FictionAlley's Primer (http://www.fictionalley.org/primer/dictionary.html):
to which my reaction was also roughly "why do people bother to set up such scenarios?".
No personal offense intended; this is probably just a result of the discrepancy between the fan vs casual reader mindsets; I've simply never put much energy into exploring the Potterverse beyond reading the books.
So you've got the buildup, and then the War.
That's still possible, of course.
Re: Harry Potter fandom
Date: Monday, 22 September 2003 10:53 (UTC)For purposes of fan fiction.
However, the theory that the last three books will form a complete arc isn't really what's meant by the term 'fanon'. It's speculative meta-analysis, sure, but it's not generally accepted or defended as truth when it comes up. That's the difference: When a group of fans have become so attached to an idea that they're no longer open to anything else, then it's fanon.
A good example of this would be the idea that Remus Lupin is "a very sweet and forgiving person". As a casual reader, I'm sure you'd disagree with this, as do I. However, it's a characterization point that a *lot* of writers have used in fan fiction (where whitewashing the flaws of characters is unfortunately common), and it's definitely widespread fanon, even though there's convincing evidence against it in the books.
I'm somewhat known for being rather opposed to fanon, myself. I think it makes for lazy writing and unproductive debate. I try to analyze these books the same way I'd analyze any other literature (which I enjoy doing): by continually going back to the text, not my own assumptions.
No personal offense intended
Nah, I'm not offended. I'm used to being razzed for my, uh, interest. :) As I'm sure you've met with puzzlement and ridicule for your own unusual hobby of conlanging.
Re: Harry Potter fandom
Date: Monday, 22 September 2003 11:20 (UTC)True.