Random thought
Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:51I'd've thought that one of the points of having a local sports team (whether it be football, tennis, or whatever) is to show how well the locals can play that sport.
Trading players to other teams would seem to defeat that point; after all, what's the use of cheering for, say, your city's team if only one of the players is actually from that city? That would seem to defeat the purpose of team loyalty to me. You might be cheering one some of the same players that you were booing out last season, because they were on the rival city's team.
The immediate result would seem to be that the success of a team is determined less by how well people in a given city play the sport and/or how well they can train others, but by how much money the local team has to buy top athletes.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:03 (UTC)I still don't get the "team loyalty" thing, though, where you'll cheer for $FavouriteTeam regardless of whether they play, since that name is merely a label for a random bunch of people who don't have any particular defining characteristics.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:08 (UTC)Lots and lots of people migrate to the west coast, so you get a mix out here of people who are rooting for the local teams and their "home" teams from whereever they moved from. I'm under the impression that even though people move around they're much more diehard about their home teams.
As for why to root for a team, I think it's more a of a tradition -- your family liked this team so you root for them too -- and also liking the overall team: management, stadium, the show they put on, the players (especially long-term even if they aren't local). There is still a fair amount of jibing players who move around. I think Seattleites boo Alex Rodrigues who moved to the Yankees to get a championship.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:08 (UTC)