The Problem with Wikipedia
Monday, 29 January 2007 12:20
xkcd_rss captures the problem with Wikipedia rather well:

Wikipedia can take up hours, because there's just so much, and it's all interlinked, and I find such "info-junk" so fascinating.
xkcd_rss captures the problem with Wikipedia rather well:

Wikipedia can take up hours, because there's just so much, and it's all interlinked, and I find such "info-junk" so fascinating.
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 13:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 13:16 (UTC)Occasionally, but usually not. It's usually more entertainment than education.
I limit myself to Wikipedia because I found that it could eat up hours of my day but I didn't feel more knowledgeable as a result.
Sounds like a plan I should consider.
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 13:33 (UTC)I find Wikipedia good for trivia, but not much more. I wrote the Wikipedia page on Ubykh back when I was much more idealistic about the concept of Wikipedia, but after seeing the number of trolls and vandals that skulk around the site, I've pretty much given up.
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 14:21 (UTC)Not to mention the arcane bureaucracy, process, and red tape.
I've ignored that for the most part so far, but I've seen enough to suspect that should I start taking a more active part, I'd be disgusted, too.
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 14:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 23:38 (UTC)Gary Glitter -> Ubykh language (http://tools.wikimedia.de/sixdeg/index.jsp?from=Gary+Glitter&to=Ubykh+language&ign_dates=1)
I assume you know of the Oracle of Bacon?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 05:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 07:02 (UTC)I seem to recall you were having some problems with the Moldovan pages some time ago, yes? Did that ever get resolved?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:49 (UTC)Paradoxically, the article on the Romanian Wikipedia about the language is more complete and more neutral than the one on the English Wikipedia is. Completely contrary to all of my expectations -- 6 months ago, it was full of Romanian nationalist polemics and I did not expect that to go away.
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 16:09 (UTC)What am i ever going to do with all this useless knowledge? ;)
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 22:35 (UTC)waste spendwaste so much time there. :DAlso, out of curiosity - the boyfriend and I were in disagreement. How do most people pronounce "Wikipedia"? I say "wi-key-pedia", and he says "wik-ah-pedia". :\
no subject
Date: Monday, 29 January 2007 22:38 (UTC)Nyssa
Batman
Black Mask (comics)
Torture
Serial killers
I connect with a lot of things, mostly through the "Batman" page.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 06:59 (UTC)pronunciation of "Wikipedia"
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 07:01 (UTC)As for me, though, I pronounce "wiki" to rhyme with "sticky" or "quicky", and "Wikipedia" therefore would rhyme with "sticky speedier" (my default 'lect is non-rhotic).
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:58 (UTC)The etymological pronunciation would be something between "vee-key-pedia" and "wee-key-pedia".
My view is that it should be "wik-ah-pedia" or "wik-kih-pedia" because the unstressed medial [i:] (the unaccented occurance in the middle of a word of the "ee" sound in "machine" or "lee") is not natural in English. For ease of pronunciation, in quick speech, even when I used to try to say "wee-kee-pee-dee-a", it tended to turn out with the "kee" clipped and I ended up saying basically "Wicca-pedia", which is how I think the majority of the English-speaking world pronounces it.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 13:28 (UTC)I'm not quite sure what sound "kih" is supposed to represent.
However, how would you pronounce "Stickypedia"? For me, final -y in "sticky" and similar words seems to be something like [i] rather than [I] (though whether it's the same phoneme as in "eat" or as in "it", I'm not sure -- the sound seems to be somewhere in between).
I think "posh" RP uses [I] for this sound, but I thought that [i], or something similar, is not uncommon.
So while that might not be [i:] as in "machine" or "lee", I would have expected a "wickypedia" pronunciation to be present as well.
Unless you have the same vowel in both syllables of "sticky"?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:26 (UTC)I would probably pronounce "stickypedia" with an [I] although I use [i] for the last syllable of "sticky"; this is with a Western American accent.
You're right though, it is definitely variable.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:30 (UTC)