Amy uses very few syllable-initial consonant clusters, which occasionally makes her hard to understand. (This isn't unusual for children her age, as I understand.) For example, if she lies down and snores, she's 'leeping, and if she runs around with outstretched arms, she's 'lying. And the colourful things that grow on meadows are 'lowers.
She's recently started trying to make initial clusters with an /l/ as second element -- typically, they'll turn out either as /ɬ/ -- much like Welsh "ll" -- or as something like /ɕl/ (regardless of whether it's /sl/ /fl/ /bl/ or whatever in standard pronunciation).
She seems to tend to read boustrophedonically -- if I ask her to spell out words on short two-line inscriptions, she'll tend to spell the bottom line right-to-left.
She also doesn't seem to distinguish yet between things such as "14" and "41" (since they're both "a one and a four"), and while she can recognise some two-digit numbers (especially "14" = "fourteen", perhaps since that's her favourite bus), she'll tend to read "11" as "two", since it's "one and one". (Cue polysemy of "one".)
When counting, she'll typically go ..., eleven, twelve, fourteen, sixteen; I wonder whether this because "thir" and "fif" are not words while "four" and "six" are.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 14:10 (UTC)What it is like for her in German? I imagine she shouldn't have problems with 13 and 15 in German, but perhaps with 16. But then again it seems odd to me to think that she'd misread certain numbers only in one language.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:46 (UTC)But when I asked Stella just now, she counted with Amy, and it went "..., zehn, elf, zwan... zwölf, dreizehn, vierzehn, sechzehn, sieben... kannst du mir helfen? siebzehn siebzehn, achtzehn, neunzehn, zwanzig".
So "sechzehn" was fine, for some reason (and it wasn't "sechszehn", either), but she left out "fünfzehn". And her "vierzehn" sounded like "vier" + "zehn", whereas for me the vowel in the first syllable of "vierzehn" is short, as in "Birne".
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:38 (UTC)Oh, I forgot that in your lect and in standard pronunciation "vierzehn" has a different vowel from "vier"; that's why I only asked about "sechzehn". Amy's pronunciation of "vierzehn" would be just fine in my lect.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:45 (UTC)Long vowel is perhaps slightly more formal, but not odd the way "vierzehn" with long vowel sounds to me.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:13 (UTC)According to my parents, I was writing right-to-left too - with my left hand, although I'm not left-handed.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:42 (UTC)J still has a hard time with cluster sounds. Like, we we go in an airplane we're 'fying'.Or when he's laying down taking a nap, he's 'seeping'.
When counting, she'll typically go ..., eleven, twelve, fourteen, sixteen; I wonder whether this because "thir" and "fif" are not words while "four" and "six" are.
J does that too! *L*
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:48 (UTC)Which of the sounds gets dropped wasn't always constant, either; I think I've heard both "lying" and "fying" for "flying".
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 16:05 (UTC)That's another thing we've been working on with J..unless you're around him a lot, half the things that come out his mouth are a complete mystery. People are always going, "What did he say?" to us.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:43 (UTC)So-so. It doesn't help that she speaks fairly softly most of the time.
Being around her for a while definitely helps, but yes, I think people often have to ask her to repeat herself so that they can have a second attempt at deciphering her sometimes.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 9 August 2008 22:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 10 August 2008 23:50 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 11 August 2008 07:24 (UTC)You were one of three or four commenters to that entry to get a bunch of spam replies today; apparently with text grabbed from a web page somewhere.
I've deleted-and-marked-as-spam them, for all the good that'll do (I doubt they're anything but throw-away usernames that won't get reused).
no subject
Date: Monday, 11 August 2008 22:06 (UTC)Honestly, looks like they were grabbing the top couple of posts to reply to, so was probably just bad luck on my part. :)