For glory, it should be sufficient to have the changelog entry link to the Zilla bug that has your patch on it. :) For actual relevance, I suppose filing a contribution (http://www.livejournal.com/site/contributors.bml) is the way to go.
Not at all - I was just joking really. Sometimes, though, I see other people getting mentioned and I hope to see my name there sometime, but it doesn't actually bother me and I've forgotten about it by the end of the entry. It's nice when you can make a contribution (I think I've had two things added, both before the days of Zilla), but I guess everyone wants to see their name "up in lights", so to speak:)
no subject
Date: Monday, 19 May 2003 10:38 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 19 May 2003 16:22 (UTC)For glory, it should be sufficient to have the changelog entry link to the Zilla bug that has your patch on it. :) For actual relevance, I suppose filing a contribution (http://www.livejournal.com/site/contributors.bml) is the way to go.
no subject
Date: Monday, 19 May 2003 16:54 (UTC)Not at all - I was just joking really. Sometimes, though, I see other people getting mentioned and I hope to see my name there sometime, but it doesn't actually bother me and I've forgotten about it by the end of the entry. It's nice when you can make a contribution (I think I've had two things added, both before the days of Zilla), but I guess everyone wants to see their name "up in lights", so to speak:)
Re:
Date: Monday, 19 May 2003 17:38 (UTC)