pne: A picture of a plush toy, halfway between a duck and a platypus, with a green body and a yellow bill and feet. (Default)
[personal profile] pne

An interesting article that John Cowan pointed out to me—using "black" vs "white" to talk about sexism in language (including, but not limited to, pronouns).

Date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 17:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elgrande.livejournal.com
But then again, I think the text gives us a bit of a false impression.

I guess I'm just stating the obvious, but since we aren't familiar with the pronouns "whis" and "bler", everytime we see them we think of a clear distinction between "white" and "black". But that impression isn't crated so cleary when we hear the words "his" and "her", or especially words like "mankind", where the "man" bit certainly doesn't include a "male" meaning.

The article also gives me the impression that one should get rid of the distinction between "whis" and "bler" altogether. So, just like you, I can only come to the conclusion that following the logic of the article, one also ought to stop distinguish between "his" and "her". But feminists don't seem to want to get rid of the distinction between "his" and "her". You can speak of a girl as "she" and of a boy as "he", and nobody - neither males nor females - will complain. But speaking of a black boy as a "ble" and of a white boy as "whe" sounds weird, perhaps even offensive - at least to me. (Perhaps this is because talking about people's races is a bit of a taboo topic, isn't it? Nobody would object to sentences like "Do you know that girl?", but "Do you know that black person?" is less socially acceptable, if I'm not mistaken. So, if in that society peopel can talk about races more openly, the distinction between "ble" and "whe" may not be so shocking in the first place.) So, I think comparing "racism" and "sexism" doesn't work here very well.

Hmm, now that I'm thinking about it: shouldn't German-speaking children feel discriminated against if children are usually referred to as "du" and most adults as "Sie"? I mean in a lot of manuals and similar books only "Sie" is mentioned. Couldn't children feel excluded and ask the company why they think only adults will use their products? Sometimes in speeches people say "Sie und ihr" to clearly address both children and adults.

Date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 21:12 (UTC)
ext_78: A picture of a plush animal. It looks a bit like a cross between a duck and a platypus. (Default)
From: [identity profile] pne.livejournal.com
You can speak of a girl as "she" and of a boy as "he", and nobody - neither males nor females - will complain.

There are some people who will complain, though - especially those who can't (or don't want to) categorise themselves as "male" or "female". Or those who, for some reason, believe that gender is truly irrelevant and should not be mentioned.

Also, which pronoun do you use if the gender is not known? "Ah! I see that tomorrow Dr. Smith will be giving a lecture. I hope it will be interesting to listen to XXX (him? her? him or her? it? them? em? zir?)" Having gendered pronouns forces you to make this distinction.

Similarly with your "Sie und ihr" example - if you're speaking about a group of people: "Each participant must bring his/her/its/their/zir/eir/??? own notebook."

NB I tend to be fairly conservative on this point and use "he" if the gender is un-known, but wanted to point out that I've found that there are people who do not like gendered pronouns, and I think the above are some of the points that have been made.

Profile

pne: A picture of a plush toy, halfway between a duck and a platypus, with a green body and a yellow bill and feet. (Default)
Philip Newton

June 2015

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
14151617181920
2122232425 2627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, 2 January 2026 15:49
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios