German has uvular fricatives!
Thursday, 23 December 2004 14:30Hm, up till now I thought that German /x/ was [x]... but after listening to this page, I'm convinced that it's actually [X] (and that my /r/ is [R], not [G]).
(Also, my attempts at rhotic trills seem to be closer to an [R\] (uvular trill) than to an [r] (alveolar trill). Heh. My trills suck, and I blame my frenulum.)
Re: [C] vs [x]
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2004 15:52 (UTC)But I read that "Buch" and "ach" have different consonants, I think. I can't hear a difference between the two sounds though, but then again I can't hear the difference between [x] and [X] otherwise either, do I don't know if it's true.
Re: [C] vs [x]
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2004 20:18 (UTC)Re: [C] vs [x]
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2004 20:51 (UTC)*nods* the first has the "ich-Laut" ([C]) and the second has the "ach-Laut" ([X]).
Briefly speaking, /x/ is [C] after front vowels such as /y/ and [X] after back vowels such as /a/.
Not as sure about "Buch."
It has the sound of /x/ after back vowels. However, it's true that I do pronounce it slightly more forward than the sound in "acht".
Incidentally, I also have [C] in my English, I think -- for me, "huge" /hju:dZ/ is roughly [Cu:dZ].
Re: [C] vs [x]
Date: Friday, 24 December 2004 02:38 (UTC)Buch vs ach
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2004 20:49 (UTC)Hmm... *tries it out*
You may be right. I'm not sure the consonant in "Buch" is far enough forward to be [x], but it feels more forward to me than the sound in "ach", which seems a lot more uvular to me.